A community of active participants in a developed world with projects stirred to further expand and develop the crypto world.
Aptos laid a sweet roadmap for her community members by airdropping her active participants with the said community reward/ airdrop allocation as promised.
Sui had a rigorous type of call for engagement from Sui capy to various type of oat claims yet choose to use capital requirement for rewarding her testnet community.
There should be better way of rewarding
#what do you feel
#how do you feel
It is sad that SUI neglected the community that have stood by them all this while.
I choose APTOS anyday anytime
Sui was a waste of time
Aptos remains the best when it comes to rewarding community members
I really hope Aptos can do something to bring users back to the ecosystem.
I dont have many skills on-chain research but the fact is many members of my community are “dive-in” Sui ecosystem
I think aptos is the better @lareofw_h
You are right, the eligibility procedure was bad even someone who had not interacted was able to get a drop just for been on dc. It unfair to people who burst their ass with doing sui tasks back then. we all know ow stressful it was. They could have done better
Aptos is what SUI wished they were
I choose APTOS, 100% with love
Sui used themself for an experiment which back fired. If they did an onchain airdrop, it’s another way of creating a volume which would affect their MC. But they decided they wan CEX, but what’s funny is those CEX suspended withdrawal on Sui network, so must pple had to convert to other networks which is very bad for the chain. No stress testing for the mainnet at launch.
But aptos did good. 3% at first to bring onchain interaction, projects on aptos were able to get more interaction too. Aptos easily clocked its 1billion MC but Sui is still finding it difficult to clock a 3/4 of that.
Aptos and sui are both great project, I love them